Pseudo-Scholars, please be fair to history

 Pseudo-Scholars, please be fair to history we find from the Yi Zhongtian
, when the moon, Jilian Hai, where Dan sees in history is the history of entertainment, not real history, is being misinterpreted or distorted history. They today's demanding vision and thinking of history, so people see the eyes of their own history, rather than the real historical truth. they lack the academic spirit, and no appreciation of the scientific theory of history. What is its purpose? fame, phony .
Yi Zhongtian, when the moon, Jilian Hai, Dan represented in pseudo-literary history and culture with their own knowledge of a little jump to that history, the stain with a fig leaf or the history presented to us, seriously mislead the next generation, affecting the academic spirit of science, is an unprecedented subversion of academic. actually it was their own lack of an objective and impartial performance of the scientific attitude is ignorant of the story unfolds. ignorance can be fearless, used them more appropriate than the.
our history culture, not their good works, historical truth with today's aesthetic criteria to be extremist rhetoric and explain, in fact, these outstanding works and the true history, carrying at the time of the history and the historical process pushed to today on the promotion and is now a reference.
only fair and objective look at history, history and culture, we can inherit and carry forward the excellent history and culture, the attitude of a rational reason to remove the dregs of history and culture. do this First, to restore the truth of history, there is no real historical background, there is no science of history. how can you not have the correct view of history come to a scientific conclusion? Joking history and historical stain on history, is the history and culture adultery. Joking distort history and the history, this is their irresponsible behavior, and its despicable acts is to make people angry.
Yi Zhongtian, when the moon, Jilian Hai, Yu Dan a whole group of people to disassembled to pieces of history, the history and culture of thinking in their own simple filter, with their history and culture superficial cultural commentary, is a completely ruined.
shoulder responsibility for culture is irresponsible to history and culture laced sand behavior is immoral and irresponsible.
history with today's eyes, said, beginning to deny history. they want to do? do is to add the weight of history being developed? them this easy, until the correct history, we have to pay the price for what they do with conscience evaluated?
strongly recommended that cultural authorities, responsible for the history of contemporary responsible for the next generation of responsible, and resolutely stop infringement of their history and culture, so a bunch of pseudo-literary justice to history.